What does the phrase “museum” make you consider? For many people, the very first thing that involves thoughts could also be an artwork museum, maybe an encyclopedic museum, an enormous establishment just like the Metropolitan Museum of Art or the Museum of Modern Art or the British Museum or the Louvre, or possibly the American Museum of Natural History or the museums that make up the Smithsonian. But museums are available in a kaleidoscope of sizes and topic issues.
Whatever their kind, all have been affected deeply — like the remainder of us — by COVID-19 and this 12 months’s financial lockdown. To get an concept of how this labored on an area degree, along with my very own analysis, I spoke with workers members of three very totally different space museums right here in south-central Indiana: the Eskenazi Museum of Art (one of many museums at Indiana University Bloomington); WonderLab Museum of Science, Health and Technology, a science museum in Bloomington geared particularly towards youngsters (and the uncommon museum in Bloomington that isn’t a part of the college); and the Atterbury-Bakalar Air Museum in Columbus.
One factor that these museums share, not surprisingly, is a way of uncertainty. The Atterbury-Bakalar Air Museum had initially deliberate a “soft” reopening on July 9 (admitting the general public solely on Thursdays via Saturdays) however modified this to August 1, solely on Saturdays, and for extra restricted hours. (The museum has since delayed its opening even additional, because the state of Indiana has prolonged its reopening course of.) WonderLab has a provisional reopening plan for early August, however it’s not but publicly introduced, and is topic to vary. (Aleisha Kropf, their advertising and communications director, instructed me that it’s “quite possible” that the opening could be delayed.) For the Eskenazi Museum, lockdown got here simply months into reopening after a three-year closure for renovation. Museums are taking part in reopenings, and every thing else, by ear.
Each of the museums I spoke to is funded in a different way, and the lockdown has affected the funding of every museum in very alternative ways. About half of WonderLab’s funding comes from donations, the opposite half from “earned revenue.” Some of their largest income mills, corresponding to summer season camp, have needed to be canceled. Neither the Eskenazi nor Atterbury-Bakalar costs for admission. Base funding for the Eskenazi is supplied by Indiana University, and in the course of the lockdown the college has reduce that funding by 5%. Atterbury-Bakalar is funded primarily by a stipend from the Columbus Municipal Airport Board of Aviation.
Not surprisingly, staff at WonderLab have been most deeply affected by the pandemic, with part-time workers laid off and everlasting workers having hours lowered; nevertheless, the museum has acquired a sequence of grants and loans, together with a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) mortgage (within the vary of $150k-$350ok) which has coated workers salaries and allowed all full-time workers to return to regular hours. The Eskenazi Museum has not needed to lay off or furlough any staff. Atterbury-Bakalar is staffed completely by volunteers — since they’re principally retired, they’re significantly cautious about returning to the museum.
Both WonderLab and the Eskenazi have been pushed by the lockdown to focus extra on digital facets of their museums. WonderLab has seen a really constructive response to their digital applications, together with consideration from out-of-state residents. The Eskenazi’s concentrate on digital facets consists of not solely applications however its on-line collections. Both museums are contemplating the function of expertise of their long-term plans, and the way digital choices would possibly turn out to be extra important after the pandemic.
More broadly, all the museums emphasised the necessity for change shifting ahead. “Our executive director asked if anyone could think of a single thing that hasn’t been rethought or redone to cope with COVID,” WonderLab’s Kropf instructed me. “Someone suggested that the doors were the same. But no, they are not. It made us all laugh. The way we do every single thing on every level has changed. Even the way we open the doors.”
* * *
What does the long run maintain for museums extra typically? The hanging query over what public life will appear to be within the close to future can solely exacerbate the discouraging traits which were in place for a while.
Let’s contemplate artwork museums: Over 50 years in the past, Pierre Bourdieu and Alain Darbel demonstrated how European artwork museums exist at a take away from the every day lives of most individuals, that the “love of art” is tied intently to the higher class. In the many years since, we’ve seen attendance rise with the emergence of blockbuster exhibitions — after which fall once more to pre-blockbuster ranges after the financial downturn of 2007–08. Even with improved numbers over the previous few years, in 2017 solely 23.7% of American adults reported visiting an artwork museum or gallery within the earlier 12 months. Art museums proceed to lie exterior of most individuals’s expertise. Surveys constantly present that museum attendance is as extremely correlated with each training and earnings because it was within the 1960s. Relatively few folks can afford to go to museums, or at the very least giant museums in main cities. And, not surprisingly, artwork museums don’t appear to be related to the lives of a majority of individuals.
How a lot does this matter to museums? With admissions making up a small proportion of museum income, and authorities funding lowering, many museums have more and more relied on philanthropy. When the Met established a compulsory admission charge for out-of-state guests in 2018, the statements of the president and CEO mirrored that relative significance: Visitors had been unfairly criticized for not paying their means whereas rich donors had been praised as “our generous contributors.” We would possibly ask whether or not many of the public wants museums. We may additionally ask, with museum attendance making such a small a part of income: Do they want us?
In actuality, museums merely mirror the large inequalities in society at giant. After the pandemic, museums could symbolize an excellent larger focus of wealth in fewer arms. The American Alliance of Museums has repeatedly warned that roughly a 3rd of museums could by no means reopen. Almost half of these that can reopen count on to take action with lowered workers. A research of the humanities and tradition sector of New York City means that the income of smaller establishments has been disproportionately affected by the lockdown. Inequality can be mirrored within the dealing with of loans for museums and different establishments. Although PPP loans had been designed for small companies, many bigger organizations additionally acquired them by way of loopholes. Watchdog teams are additionally involved concerning the lack of oversight for these loans, with questions on what number of establishments are receiving loans however not retaining jobs as they need to. Regardless, as we’ve seen from headlines, many museums have already needed to lay off employees. And, because the PPP loans had been meant to cowl simply two months of payroll, museums are resuming layoffs because the loans expired. Workers, particularly susceptible ones working solely part-time, could bear the brunt of the disaster.
At the identical time, the lockdown has impressed some curators and museums to indicate the chances of what museums can do after the pandemic. Dan Hicks, Curator of Archaeology on the Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford, began the hashtag #MuseumsUnlocked on Twitter, which for 100 days invited anybody to share photographs of objects in museum collections and monuments all over the world, organized round a unique theme every day. The venture was collaborative, with the participation of official museum accounts, museum workers, and most people. The use of digital areas and cooperative spirit on this and different tasks are extremely promising. Hicks and a handful of different museum curators and administrators have publicly embraced the potential for museums to handle their racist pasts, repatriate artifacts, and work extra intently with their communities after COVID-19. This is all for the great. But can these suggestions be applied within the present disaster? The pandemic has additionally seen many museums make formulaic statements in favor of Black Lives Matter or “systemic change,” however with no actual plan to observe via on such statements. And with rising inequality, the general public could have even much less of a say about museums’ actions and missions than earlier than.
Ultimately, what these traits present is that, if we wish museums to mirror our values extra, we could must remake not solely them however our society as a complete. What are our priorities and the way will we wish to fund them? Do we have to rethink our concept of a museum as properly? “Museum” doesn’t must imply an artwork museum, or a significant establishment with blockbuster exhibitions. Of course, a big number of museums of various sorts and sizes already exists. Perhaps we don’t must recreate museums as a lot as broaden our current conceptions of them. It’s useful to check museums with public libraries: Libraries are areas arrange to be used, not simply passive watching; they lend gadgets out to customers, and supply primary companies (computer systems, web, printing, workshops on varied matters) that communities want — all at no cost. The future could also be in smaller museums, not simply extra attentive to communities however extra pushed by them. As the museum workers I spoke with advised, the disaster could also be a possibility in spite of everything.